LOW COST AI
עב

Veo 3.1 vs Veo 3.1 Fast vs Veo 3.1 Lite: which to choose

Google offers its Veo 3.1 video model in three versions: the full Veo 3.1, Veo 3.1 Fast and Veo 3.1 Lite. All three make clips of 4, 6 or 8 seconds with sound, landscape or vertical, from a prompt or from an image. They differ mainly in price, in dialogue and in quality rankings, and in what Google documents for each one. This guide compares them by Google’s official documentation, by what you can pick here, by independent rankings and by the prices here right now.

ComparisonsUpdated October 12, 202610 min read

On this page
  1. The short answer
  2. The three versions side by side
  3. What each version costs
  4. Quality: what the independent rankings say
  5. Sound and dialogue and the Hebrew question
  6. Start image and reference images
  7. What to choose by use
  8. Questions and answers

The short answer

  • Veo 3.1 for the final version. The full version, with dialogue, effects and ambience created together with the picture, up to 4K and up to 3 reference images. In the independent rankings for animating an image it is the highest ranked of the three
  • Veo 3.1 Fast for most of the work. According to Google it has the same options as Veo 3.1, reference images and 4K included, and it costs less. In the text to video rankings it sits almost level with Veo 3.1
  • Veo 3.1 Lite for drafts and volume. Google describes it as its most cost-effective video model. Google documents neither 4K nor reference images for it, but here you can pick both, and both worked in our test

To give a sense of price, an 8 second clip at 720p with sound costs ₪5.8658.58 crVeo 3.1, 720p · 8s · with sound in Veo 3.1, ₪1.4114.06 crVeo 3.1 Fast, 720p · 8s · with sound in Fast and ₪0.707.03 crVeo 3.1 Lite, 720p · 8s · with sound in Lite right now. The prices are computed as the page loads, with the same calculation the studio shows before every generation.

The three versions side by side

The table sums up what Google states about each version in its official documentation, as we read it on October 11, 2026, and what you can pick here where that differs.

Veo 3.1 vs Veo 3.1 Fast vs Veo 3.1 Lite
Veo 3.1Veo 3.1 FastVeo 3.1 Lite
First releasedOctober 2025October 2025March 2026
Clip length4, 6 or 8 seconds4, 6 or 8 seconds4, 6 or 8 seconds
Resolution720p, 1080p and 4K. Google: 1080p and 4K only at 8 seconds, and here at 4 and 6 seconds too720p, 1080p and 4K. Google: 1080p and 4K only at 8 seconds, and here at 4 and 6 seconds too720p and 1080p according to Google. Here 4K too
Aspect ratio16:9 landscape or 9:16 vertical16:9 landscape or 9:16 vertical16:9 landscape or 9:16 vertical
SoundDialogue, effects and ambience created together with the pictureDialogue, effects and ambience created together with the pictureCreated together with the clip. Google does not describe dialogue separately
Start and end imageYesYesYes
Reference imagesUp to 3, in an 8 second clipUp to 3, in an 8 second clipNot documented by Google. Here up to 3, in an 8 second clip
Frames per second242424

Three more things from the documentation: in all three versions an end image works only together with a start image. Google writes that a prompt in English is fully supported, while other languages have not been evaluated and may work with varying results. And as for 4K in Fast, it appears in the Gemini API documentation but not on Google’s Vertex AI model page.

One more thing we checked ourselves: with sound on, 1080p and 4K are made here by enlarging a 720p clip (in Veo 3.1, for a clip without reference images). In our test, Fast without sound made 1080p at full resolution.

What each version costs

The table is computed as the page loads, for an 8 second clip with sound, with the same calculation the studio shows before every generation. Right now Lite is the cheapest of the three at every resolution, 4K included, and the full Veo 3.1 is the most expensive.

An 8 second clip by resolution
ModelSettingsPriceCredits
Veo 3.1720p · 8s · with sound₪5.8658.58 cr
Veo 3.1 Fast720p · 8s · with sound₪1.4114.06 cr
Veo 3.1 Lite720p · 8s · with sound₪0.707.03 cr
Veo 3.11080p · 8s · with sound₪5.9859.76 cr
Veo 3.1 Fast1080p · 8s · with sound₪1.5215.24 cr
Veo 3.1 Lite1080p · 8s · with sound₪0.828.21 cr
Veo 3.14K · 8s · with sound₪8.9189.05 cr
Veo 3.1 Fast4K · 8s · with sound₪4.2242.18 cr
Veo 3.1 Lite4K · 8s · with sound₪3.5235.15 cr

Shorter is not always cheaper

Some models are priced by the second and some by the clip. In Fast, for example, a 4 second clip at 720p costs ₪1.4114.06 crVeo 3.1 Fast, 720p · 4s · with sound right now, and an 8 second clip costs ₪1.4114.06 crVeo 3.1 Fast, 720p · 8s · with sound. When the price is the same, there is no point in going shorter to save money: create 8 seconds and trim in editing. Every model page has a price table for every length.

Why turning sound off can cost more

In all three versions sound is on by default, and turning it off does not always save money. Right now an 8 second clip at 720p in Fast costs ₪1.4114.06 crVeo 3.1 Fast, 720p · 8s · with sound with sound and ₪3.7537.50 crVeo 3.1 Fast, 720p · 8s · no sound without it. When turning sound off costs more, the reason is that the cheapest way to create the clip always renders with sound, and a clip without sound moves to another way that costs more. The studio says so next to the switch, and if you do not need sound, you can leave it on and mute the clip.

Quality: what the independent rankings say

To compare quality, look at two independent rankings that rank video models by the votes of people who compare results: an open voting leaderboard and Artificial Analysis. This is how the rankings looked on October 11, 2026:

Place in the ranking out of all models ranked
RankingVeo 3.1Veo 3.1 FastVeo 3.1 Lite
Open voting leaderboard, text to video (updated September 21, 2026)12 of 4814 of 48Not listed
Open voting leaderboard, image to video (updated September 21, 2026)13 of 4815 of 48Not listed
Artificial Analysis, text to video19 of 2920 of 2922 of 29
Artificial Analysis, image to video12 of 3618 of 3615 of 36

For text to video the differences are very small: on the open voting leaderboard Veo 3.1 has 1364 points and Fast has 1362, a gap smaller than the margin of error the leaderboard shows for each of them. For animating an image the full Veo 3.1 leads in both rankings, and on Artificial Analysis it is Lite that ranks above Fast there. Keep in mind that the rankings measure the general preference of voters, not your goal and not Hebrew. The best test is to run the same prompt in two versions and compare.

Sound and dialogue and the Hebrew question

In Veo 3.1 and Fast sound is part of the clip: Google DeepMind describes dialogue, effects and ambience created together with the picture. For Lite, Google writes that the output is video with sound, but it does not describe dialogue separately. So when speech is the heart of the scene, Veo 3.1 or Fast is the better choice.

Google does not confirm Hebrew in any of the versions. According to Google only English was evaluated, so it is worth writing the prompt in English. When you need a Hebrew voiceover, create it separately in a voice model whose official language list includes Hebrew, such as Eleven v3, and add it to the clip in editing. The voice models are compared in the guide Hebrew AI voiceover.

Start image and reference images

In all three versions you can upload a start image, which the clip begins from, and an end image, which it ends on. According to Google, in Veo 3.1 the transition between the start and the end image comes with sound too. This is how you animate an existing image, and the guide how to turn an image into a video explains it step by step.

Reference images are something else: you attach up to 3 images of a character, an object or a scene, and the model keeps their look in a new scene. Google documents them in Veo 3.1 and Fast, in an 8 second clip. It does not document them in Lite, but here you can pick up to 3 reference images in Lite too, in an 8 second clip, and in our test two reference images held through the whole clip. Right now an 8 second clip at 720p with reference images costs ₪15.00149.97 crVeo 3.1, 720p · 8s · with sound in Veo 3.1, ₪1.4114.06 crVeo 3.1 Fast, 720p · 8s · with sound in Fast and ₪0.707.03 crVeo 3.1 Lite, 720p · 8s · with sound in Lite.

Vertical video

All three versions make a landscape clip at 16:9 or a vertical one at 9:16, the format of Reels, Stories and Shorts. You choose the aspect ratio before you generate.

What to choose by use

A recommendation by kind of clip
What you needThe versionWhy
A final scene with dialogueVeo 3.1The full version, and the highest ranked of the three for animating an image
Most clips with soundVeo 3.1 FastThe same options at a lower price, and an almost identical text to video ranking
Many drafts and testing ideasVeo 3.1 LiteThe cheapest of the three at every resolution
A 4K clip on a budgetVeo 3.1 LiteWith sound on and no reference images, 4K is made here by enlarging a 720p clip in all three, and Lite is the cheapest
The same character or product across several clipsAny of the threeAll of them take up to 3 reference images here in an 8 second clip. Lite costs least, and Veo 3.1 or Fast fit when the character also speaks
Animating an existing imageAny of the threeAll of them have a start and an end image, and Lite is the cheapest

If you are not sure, start with Lite or Fast to test the prompt, and move to Veo 3.1 only for the final version. All three versions work from the same balance and in the same studio, and before every generation the exact price is shown, which is the amount that leaves your balance.

If you are weighing Veo against another family, the guides Veo 3.1 vs Kling 3.0 and how to choose an AI video model compare them.

Questions and answers

What is the difference between Veo 3.1 and Veo 3.1 Fast?

According to Google both have the same options: 4, 6 or 8 seconds, sound, a start and end image, up to 3 reference images and up to 4K. Fast costs less: right now an 8 second clip at 720p costs ₪1.4114.06 crVeo 3.1 Fast, 720p · 8s · with sound in it, against ₪5.8658.58 crVeo 3.1, 720p · 8s · with sound in Veo 3.1. In the independent rankings they are almost even for text to video, and Veo 3.1 leads for animating an image

Which is cheaper: Veo 3.1 Lite or Veo 3.1 Fast?

Lite. Right now an 8 second clip at 720p costs ₪0.707.03 crVeo 3.1 Lite, 720p · 8s · with sound in Lite and ₪1.4114.06 crVeo 3.1 Fast, 720p · 8s · with sound in Fast. Google documents neither reference images nor 4K for Lite, but here you can pick both. For a scene where speech matters, Veo 3.1 or Fast is the better choice

Does Veo 3.1 Lite have sound?

Yes. According to Google the output of Lite is video with sound, and sound is on by default. Google does not describe dialogue separately for Lite, so for a scene where speech matters Veo 3.1 or Fast is the better choice

How long can a Veo 3.1 clip be?

4, 6 or 8 seconds, in all three versions. For a longer clip in one generation you need another model, and the options are in the guide AI video longer than 8 seconds

Does Veo 3.1 make vertical video for Reels?

Yes. All three versions make a vertical clip at 9:16, and a landscape one at 16:9. You choose the aspect ratio before you generate

Does Veo 3.1 speak Hebrew?

There is no official confirmation. According to Google only English was evaluated, and other languages may work with varying results. For a Hebrew voiceover, use a voice model such as Eleven v3 and add it to the clip in editing